dog charges at me_1959

Gang Stalkers Repeatedly Attacking and Threatening my Life

Below you find links to multiple related posts about threats to my life.

 (See UPDATE below two days later again this guys dog came after me and he said “he was never given a fine the first time” . Then he did not get a fine the second time and still had the leash in his hand without his dangerous  dog being on a leash) You can see in my photos of him that he does not kept his eye on his dog and look at the concerned look of the man that was ealking near his dog.

Guys’ dog bit my ankle.

Here is my statement I emailed to the Police after they caught this guy and gave him a $350 fine for not having his dog on a leash.

  • Sep 13 at 1:02 AM
Hi. I am writing this statement for your records.
Today the 12th i was riding by the Hotel just beside Scotia Square when I pasted the man with his dog walking in front of him.
I stopped and spoke with the man for a few seconds after the man told me about his dog  as I passed by and he mentioned that his dog sometime will bit tires on wheelchairs.
I stopped to turn a bit so I could see the man but before I could turn around I heard the dog barking violently and charging at me. The dog bit my right ankle and was not letting go. The man came over and pulled the dog off and the dog had a hold of my pant leg and would not let go. When the man pulled his dog off it pulled my foot off my wheelchair foot pedal. The dog then continued to hold on to my pant leg while growling.
Fortunately I had ankle high heavy leather boots on so I did not get injured.
SIDE NOTE: What puzzles me is that I was at least twenty feet ahead of the man and the dog when he said to me that his dog will bite wheelchair tires. right after he said that before I even started turning back to look at to respond to his statement. I heard his dog barking and barking as he charged me. What is puzzling is the dog did not attack my chair at all and my chair was not moving when the dog got close.
Not once did the man scream at his dog nor did he give it any commands to stop.
I can only wonder if he gave his dog an attack command with a hand signal when the dog charged at me.
I was no where near the dog. I was way ahead by then so why did the dog charge at me long after I had passed by?
I said to the man why are you walking your dangerous dog with the leash in your hand and not having your dog on the leash.
I knew I could not again attempt to move my wheelchair while the dog was still lose.
I asked the man to put his dog on his leash.
The man refused. So I asked a couple more times. So then I said to him that I will call 911 if he does not put his dog on the leash. That was because I did not want to be bitten again.
So I phoned 9111 and waited after the man started walking away with his dog far ahead of him.
When the dog was far enough away I felt it safe to move again.
I followed him as I spoke with the Police. The chase went all the way to past Keith brewery on the waterfront. The man often started running..
Fortunately wheelchairs do travel up to a fast jog speed.
Thank you for your speedy response..Be safe..
Sincerely Daniel J Towsey
By the way. My wheelchair video camera did not record as it was out of memory..



UPDATE Sept 14 2014

Guy whos’ dog bit me two days ago, later again comes after me

While I was coming down a lane doing my report on September 14th 2014 at 11:30am about the Gottingen St Area  Huge fire, this guys dog launched at me while barking AGAIN.. Complete report with photos and video coming soon. I am also doing a complete news report about the fire.

(Clip) Huge Fire Gottingen St dog comes after me again

Listen to man scream at his dog that charged at me and listen to second video to hear the guy say he never got a fine the first time.

At the 50 second point you hear the man scream at his dog that was charging at me.

Guy whos dog bit me two days ago threatens me again (WheelchairCam)

Listen to my conversation. Turn up the sound so you can hear him say he was never given a fine on the first incidence..

I talked to a Police man at the scene, the Police man then went and talked to the guys and the Police man did not issue another fine for having a dog off leash.

I found out from the guy himself on video that he was never given a fine the first time.

I did get an incident report number again. This time i will have to go to the Police station to request a copy of the full reports from both incidences and I will probably go to court to press charges and sue this guy.

So I went to the Police station and they refused to give me the guys name…

There is no justice. The Police officer told that he chose not to give the guy a fine and htat was at his discretion.

Imagine that, the Police do not enforce the peoples law.. Who does this cop think he works for?

See full report about fire here.

Click on images for full size. dog charges at me_001_ dog charges at me_1959 dog charges at me_1972




Constant Serious Threats to my life on The Halifax Waterfront

see links to many reports at this post..

Guy Threatens Life of Disabled Wheelchair User For Protesting about Buses

Yesterday I was doing a protest at a bus stop with my loud speaker telling everyone about the issue in this post..and this guy was threatening and harassing me…He thought my load speaker was a threat to his child. His child was not bothered by me at all and the noise from the motor cycles and buses was much loader then I was..So does this guy chase after motorcycles too..

 This guy threatened to kill me and attacked me on Halifax Waterfront

Constant Serious Threats to my life on Halifax Waterfront

Constant Serious Threats to my life on The Halifax Waterfront

Below you will see a series of previous posts proving that the harassment on the waterfront of Halifax is a deliberate preplanned covert operation The involved parties are

The Halifax Waterfront Development Corporation LTD and Their private security guards agency,

The Nova Scotia Corporate government

The Maritime Museum of the Atlantic (a provincial owned public institution),

Fake Buskers, .

And The Halifax Police Department that is being manipulated by subversives.

George Soros of the U.N. (financing most faked events). of the U.N. Agenda 21 take over plans.

Here is a side note: Check out this operation of fake vendors who showed up on the Halifax Waterfront a couple of weeks ago giving out T-Shirts that said

Invasion Canada_7701 Invasion The Take Over

and The Communist Party.

The Communist party has been involved in all the faked protests, marches, speeches and even The Occupy Movement in the Halifax area.


Please see the videos and read my explanation of the latest event that just happened and also please see this other post I just did a few days ago.

At the beginning of this first video please watch the guy sitting on the bench by the wall. The guy with the shirt on. He is one of the guys who was an organizer of the faked Occupy movement in Halifax.  He is also the guy who conducted this entrapment sting operation and faked busker event..

The guy with no shirt is my friend. His name is George. He witnessed what happened and testified to the Police.

The guy at the microphone was extremely violent threatening, swearing on the microphone at me, Stood in front of my wheelchair while I was backed into the corner behind the the guy with no shirt.

The busker at one point grabbed his guitar ran over in front of me was threatening and yelling at me while he appeared that he intended to strike me with his guitar. It was the guy sitting on the bench that discouraged the busker from attacking me with his guitar.

This video was started just after I was able to get out of the corner after the woman you will see standing in front of my camera, the one doing the flips. She was in my face screaming at me non stop for at least ten minutes while the busker was yelling at full volume into his mask threats and obscenities at me so that The people walking by on the waterfront could not see nor could they hear what was happening to me. So I turned on my personal loud speaker and kept screaming into asking the woman to get away from me.

The guy with the shirt sitting on the bench contacted The Waterfront Development Corporation who then sent their private security. You can see that guy talking to the security guard that arrived. You will notice that the security guard came over with a previous plan of action and never talked to me about anything. The guards’ actions prove that this whole event was preplanned and a staged sting operation.

Just before the security guard arrives you will see the french buskers from Quebec arrive. Several days earlier I met them and invited the three guys and two french girls to crash on my living floor as I knew a big rain storm was coming. You see how friendly they were to me. The French performers new nothing of what had just happened to me.

Please see this post I just put up a few days ago. That occurred at the same location by the Museum.

Constant Serious Threats 1of4 to my life on The Halifax Waterfront


I will soon be adding more commentaries to the videos below with screen captures photos.

Constant Serious Threats 2of4 to my life on The Halifax Waterfront


Constant Serious Threats 3of4 to my life on The Halifax Waterfront


Constant Serious Threats 4of4 to my life on The Halifax Waterfront


Click on any image to view.Press F11 for full screen. Right thumbnail click to download.

The links below proves how extensive these threats on my life have been.

Gang Stalkers Repeatedly Attacking and Threatening my Life

Guy Threatens Life of Disabled Wheelchair User For Protesting about Buses

Yesterday I was doing a protest at a bus stop with my loud speaker telling everyone about the issue in this post..and this guy was threatening and harassing me…He thought my load speaker was a threat to his child. His child was not bothered by me at all and the noise from the motor cycles and buses was much loader then I was..So does this guy chase after motorcycles too..

 This guy threatened to kill me and attacked me on Halifax Waterfront


This guy threatened to kill me and attacked me on Halifax Waterfront

I am about to tell you a very bazaar true story and will provide photos and videos below. Photos and videos were taken from far away while I was waiting for the Police to arrive.

This guy is not what he tried to appear to be… He seemed like a covert subversive operative…

See UPDATES below photos.


At approximately two pm on Friday September 5 2014, This guy stops me on the Halifax waterfront far from where these pictures were taken and gets into a political conversation with me and he seemed very interested, intelligent will spoken and agreeable.

He talks to me about positive energy and talks about negative energy where I said to him that only positive energy exists. There is no such thing as negative energy.

Negative only absorbs positive energy if one chooses to give up their positive energy to the negative usually due to fear.

So he asks me if he can do a video of my speech about what I think of the Political situation on this planet. He was aware about my being a well known blogger and activist with strong views.

Everything went well he was very amazed and really enjoyed the video speech I did. He said he would send me a message on my Youtube when he uploads the video.

When he first started recording me I asked him about his WiFi live feed advanced and very rare Samsung camera and was he doing the recording live. He did not answer me.

So I went on my way and everything seemed good.

I later crossed the harbour on the ferry and went to Woodside.

I returned to the Halifax waterfront by ferry at approximately five thirty pm.

I began rolling down the waterfront in my power wheelchair.

I then hear this guy call out to me.

So I stopped and went back to him.

I start what I thought would be a pleasant conversation and he completely cuts me off and screams out that I am a negative force and that he was going to stop me and kill me.

So as he starts to stand while saying this I turned away and started going down the boardwalk away from him.

He starts screaming at while chasing after saying he is going to kill me because I am a negative energy and that he was going to put out my energy and was going to kill.

So I was a bit of a distance from him so I stopped to turn and look at him to see where he was and what he was doing. He was yelling at and he did not realize that my wheelchair could move as fast as it did.

I then just yelled back at him and said there is no such thing as negative energy as negative is not energy.

Then I turned away from him and tried to leave.

He then ran up to me and jumped in from of my wheelchair and blocked while threatening me with his fist very close to my face.

He said and indicated he was going to assault me.

It was amazing to me that he did this with a boardwalk very busy with many people around us.

I notice that there were four different huge men walking by with their girlfriends.

The men did not know each other.

The guy was threateningly close to me with his fist in front of me, so I spun my chair around just in time to avoid being hit.

I kept spinning my chair as he kept trying to assault me.

I then heard a man somewhere behind me warning the guy to stop.

Where upon one really powerful man that was in front of me stepped in between me and the guy and told the guy to back off and leave me alone. He would not quit so then the other guys stepped in and surround this guy and he final was stopped.

I then went down the boardwalk and called the police. You can see (below) the videos I did of the guy after I phoned the police.

The videos below are unlisted on youtube and can only be viewed here.

Guy Threatens my life on Halifax waterfront

Wheelchair Cam – Guy Says He Is Going To Kill Me Halifax boardwalk

I have written this post for a public record and for my security in the event that this guy tries again when i am on the Halifax waterfront.

The Police man did get the guy’s identification is writing a report about this event. And advised the man that he was ordered to stay away from me. The Police man told me that if he came near me again that he would be arrested and charged from breaking the restraining order the Police man just put on the guy.

Policeman is talking to the guy below.

Crop of GuyThreatensToKillMe_0839 GuyThreatensToKillMe_0839 GuyThreatensToKillMe_0840 GuyThreatensToKillMe_0841 Crop of GuyThreatensToKillMe_0841

UPDATE Sept 14 2014.

I just sent this email to the Police officer.

  • Today at 6:08 AM
this is the guy who threatened and attacked me on the waterfront while I sat in my wheelchair..
This guy that attacked me is stalking me..He keeps showing up and standing near me and stalking me. The other day he ran after on the waterfront..He stalked me yesterday at the Gottingen 250 festival and a few days ago on Spring Garden Rd he was stalking me again..


The Return of George Orwell Big Brother’s War on Palestine Ukraine and the Truth

The Return of George Orwell
Big Brother’s War on Palestine, Ukraine and the Truth

Also be sure to this page of all John Pilger Documentaries.

By John Pilger

July 11, 2014 “ICH” – The other night, I saw George Orwells’s ‘1984’ performed on the London stage. Although crying out for a contemporary interpretation, Orwell’s warning about the future was presented as a period piece: remote, unthreatening, almost reassuring.

It was as if Edward Snowden had revealed nothing, Big Brother was not now a digital eavesdropper and Orwell himself had never said, “To be corrupted by totalitarianism, one does not have to live in a totalitarian country.”
Acclaimed by critics, the skilful production was a measure of our cultural and political times. When the lights came up, people were already on their way out.

They seemed unmoved, or perhaps other distractions beckoned. “What a mindfuck,” said the young woman, lighting up her phone.
As advanced societies are de-politicised, the changes are both subtle and spectacular. In everyday discourse, political language is turned on its head, as Orwell prophesised in ‘1984’.

“Democracy” is now a rhetorical device. Peace is “perpetual war”. “Global” is imperial. The once hopeful concept of “reform” now means regression, even destruction.

“Austerity” is the imposition of extreme capitalism on the poor and the gift of socialism for the rich: an ingenious system under which the majority service the debts of the few.
In the arts, hostility to political truth-telling is an article of bourgeois faith. “Picasso’s red period,” says an Observer headline, “and why politics don’t make good art.” Consider this in a newspaper that promoted the bloodbath in Iraq as a liberal crusade.

Picasso’s lifelong opposition to fascism is a footnote, just as Orwell’s radicalism has faded from the prize that appropriated his name.
A few years ago, Terry Eagleton, then professor of English literature at Manchester University, reckoned that “for the first time in two centuries, there is no eminent British poet, playwright or novelist prepared to question the foundations of the western way of life”.

No Shelley speaks for the poor, no Blake for utopian dreams, no Byron damns the corruption of the ruling class, no Thomas Carlyle and John Ruskin reveal the moral disaster of capitalism.

William Morris, Oscar Wilde, HG Wells, George Bernard Shaw have no equivalents today. Harold Pinter was the last to raise his voice.

Among the insistent voices of consumer-feminism, none echoes Virginia Woolf, who described “the arts of dominating other people… of ruling, of killing, of acquiring land and capital”.
At the National Theatre, a new play, ‘Great Britain’, satirises the phone hacking scandal that has seen journalists tried and convicted, including a former editor of Rupert Murdoch’s News of the World.

Described as a “farce with fangs [that] puts the whole incestuous [media] culture in the dock and subjects it to merciless ridicule”, the play’s targets are the “blessedly funny” characters in Britain’s tabloid press. That is well and good, and so familiar.

What of the non-tabloid media that regards itself as reputable and credible, yet serves a parallel role as an arm of state and corporate power, as in the promotion of illegal war?
The Leveson inquiry into phone hacking glimpsed this unmentionable. Tony Blair was giving evidence, complaining to His Lordship about the tabloids’ harassment of his wife, when he was interrupted by a voice from the public gallery.

David Lawley-Wakelin, a film-maker, demanded Blair’s arrest and prosecution for war crimes. There was a long pause: the shock of truth. Lord Leveson leapt to his feet and ordered the truth-teller thrown out and apologised to the war criminal.

Lawley-Wakelin was prosecuted; Blair went free.
Blair’s enduring accomplices are more respectable than the phone hackers. When the BBC arts presenter, Kirsty Wark, interviewed him on the tenth anniversary of his invasion of Iraq, she gifted him a moment he could only dream of; she allowed him to agonise over his “difficult” decision on Iraq rather than call him to account for his epic crime.

This evoked the procession of BBC journalists who in 2003 declared that Blair could feel “vindicated”, and the subsequent, “seminal” BBC series, ‘The Blair Years’, for which David Aaronovitch was chosen as the writer, presenter and interviewer.

A Murdoch retainer who campaigned for military attacks on Iraq, Libya and Syria, Aaronovitch fawned expertly.
Since the invasion of Iraq – the exemplar of an act of unprovoked aggression the Nuremberg prosecutor Robert Jackson called “the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole” – Blair and his mouthpiece and principal accomplice, Alastair Campbell, have been afforded generous space in the Guardian to rehabilitate their reputations.

Described as a Labour Party “star”, Campbell has sought the sympathy of readers for his depression and displayed his interests, though not his current assignment as advisor, with Blair, to the Egyptian military tyranny.
As Iraq is dismembered as a consequence of the Blair/Bush invasion, a Guardian headline declares: “Toppling Saddam was right, but we pulled out too soon”.

This ran across a prominent article on 13 June by a former Blair functionary, John McTernan, who also served Iraq’s CIA installed dictator Iyad Allawi.

In calling for a repeat invasion of a country his former master helped destroy, he made no reference to the deaths of at least 700,000 people, the flight of four million refugees and sectarian turmoil in a nation once proud of its communal tolerance.
“Blair embodies corruption and war,” wrote the radical Guardian columnist Seumas Milne in a spirited piece on 3 July. This is known in the trade as “balance”.

The following day, the paper published a full-page advertisement for an American Stealth bomber. On a menacing image of the bomber were the words: “The F-35. GREAT For Britain”. This other embodiment of “corruption and war” will cost British taxpayers £1.3 billion, its F-model predecessors having slaughtered people across the developing world.
In a village in Afghanistan, inhabited by the poorest of the poor, I filmed Orifa, kneeling at the graves of her husband, Gul Ahmed, a carpet weaver, seven other members of her family, including six children, and two children who were killed in the adjacent house.

A “precision” 500-pound bomb fell directly on their small mud, stone and straw house, leaving a crater 50 feet wide. Lockheed Martin, the plane’s manufacturer’s, had pride of place in the Guardian’s advertisement.
The former US secretary of state and aspiring president of the United States, Hillary Clinton, was recently on the BBC’s ‘Women’s Hour’, the quintessence of media respectability.

The presenter, Jenni Murray, presented Clinton as a beacon of female achievement. She did not remind her listeners about Clinton’s profanity that Afghanistan was invaded to “liberate” women like Orifa. She asked  Clinton nothing about her administration’s terror campaign using drones to kill women, men and children.

There was no mention of Clinton’s idle threat, while campaigning to be the first female president, to “eliminate” Iran, and nothing about her support for illegal mass surveillance and the pursuit of whistle-blowers.
Murray did ask one finger-to-the-lips question. Had Clinton forgiven Monica Lewinsky for having an affair with husband? “Forgiveness is a choice,” said Clinton, “for me, it was absolutely the right choice.”

This recalled the 1990s and the years consumed by the Lewinsky “scandal”. President Bill Clinton was then invading Haiti, and bombing the Balkans, Africa and Iraq. He was also destroying the lives of Iraqi children; Unicef reported the deaths of half a million Iraqi infants under the age of five as a result of an embargo led by the US and Britain.
The children were media unpeople, just as Hillary Clinton’s victims in the invasions she supported and promoted – Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia – are media unpeople.

Murray made no reference to them. A photograph of her and her distinguished guest, beaming, appears on the BBC website.
In politics as in journalism and the arts, it seems that dissent once tolerated in the “mainstream” has regressed to a dissidence: a metaphoric underground.

When I began a career in Britain’s Fleet Street in the 1960s, it was acceptable to critique western power as a rapacious force.

Read James Cameron’s celebrated reports of the explosion of the Hydrogen bomb at Bikini Atoll, the barbaric war in Korea and the American bombing of North Vietnam.

Today’s grand illusion is of an information age when, in truth, we live in a media age in which incessant corporate propaganda is insidious, contagious, effective and liberal.
In his 1859 essay ‘On Liberty’, to which modern liberals pay homage, John Stuart Mill wrote: “Despotism is a legitimate mode of government in dealing with barbarians, provided the end be their improvement, and the means justified by actually effecting that end.”

The “barbarians” were large sections of humanity of whom “implicit obedience” was required. “It’s a nice and convenient myth that liberals are peacemakers and conservatives the warmongers,” wrote the historian Hywel Williams in 2001, “but the imperialism of the liberal way may be more dangerous because of its open-ended nature: its conviction that it represents a superior form of life.”

He had in mind a speech by Blair in which the then prime minister promised to “reorder the world around us” according to his “moral values”.
Richard Falk, the respected authority on international law and the UN Special Rapporteur on Palestine, once described a “a self-righteous, one-way, legal/moral screen [with] positive images of western values and innocence portrayed as threatened, validating a campaign of unrestricted political violence”. It is “so widely accepted as to be virtually unchallengeable”.
Tenure and patronage reward the guardians. On BBC Radio 4, Razia Iqbal interviewed Toni Morrison, the African-American Nobel Laureate.

Morrison wondered why people were “so angry” with Barack Obama, who was “cool” and wished to build a “strong economy and health care”. Morrison was proud to have talked on the phone with her hero, who had read one of her books and invited her to his inauguration.
Neither she nor her interviewer mentioned Obama’s seven wars, including his terror campaign by drone, in which whole families, their rescuers and mourners have been murdered.

What seemed to matter was that a “finely spoken” man of colour had risen to the commanding heights of power.

In ‘The Wretched of the Earth’, Frantz Fanon wrote that the “historic mission” of the colonised was to serve as a “transmission line” to those who ruled and oppressed. In the modern era, the employment of ethnic difference in western power and propaganda systems is now seen as essential. Obama epitomises this, though the cabinet of George W. Bush – his warmongering clique – was the most multiracial in presidential history.
As the Iraqi city of Mosul fell to the jihadists of ISIS, Obama said, “The American people made huge investments and sacrifices in order to give Iraqis the opportunity to chart a better destiny.”

How “cool” is that lie? How “finely spoken” was Obama’s speech at the West Point military academy on 28 May.

Delivering his “state of the world” address at the graduation ceremony of those who “will take American leadership” across the world, Obama said, “The United States will use military force, unilaterally if necessary, when our core interests demand it. International opinion matters, but America will never ask permission…”
In repudiating international law and the rights of independent nations, the American president claims a divinity based on the might of his “indispensable nation”.

It is a familiar message of imperial impunity, though always bracing to hear. Evoking the rise of fascism in the 1930s, Obama said, “I believe in American exceptionalism with every fibre of my being.” Historian Norman Pollack wrote: “For goose-steppers, substitute the seemingly more innocuous militarisation of the total culture.

And for the bombastic leader, we have the reformer manqué, blithely at work, planning and executing assassination, smiling all the while.”
In February, the US mounted one of its “colour” coups against the elected government in Ukraine, exploiting genuine protests against corruption in Kiev.

Obama’s assistant secretary of state Victoria Nuland personally selected the leader of an “interim government”.

She nicknamed him “Yats”. Vice President Joe Biden came to Kiev, as did CIA Director John Brennan. The shock troops of their putsch were Ukrainian fascists.
For the first time since 1945, a neo-Nazi, openly anti-Semitic party controls key areas of state power in a European capital.

No Western European leader has condemned this revival of fascism in the borderland through which Hitler’s invading Nazis took millions of Russian lives.

They were supported by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), responsible for the massacre of Jews and Russians they called “vermin”.

The UPA is the historical inspiration of the present-day Svoboda Party and its fellow-travelling Right Sector. Svoboda leader Oleh Tyahnybok has called for a purge of the “Moscow-Jewish mafia” and “other scum”, including gays, feminists and those on the political left.
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States has ringed Russia with military bases, nuclear warplanes and missiles as part of its Nato Enlargement Project.

Reneging on a promise made to Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990 that Nato would not expand “one inch to the east”, Nato has, in effect, militarily occupied eastern Europe.

In the former Soviet Caucasus, Nato’s expansion is the biggest military build-up since the Second World War.
A Nato Membership Action Plan is Washington’s gift to the coup-regime in Kiev. In August, “Operation Rapid Trident” will put American and British troops on Ukraine’s Russian border and “Sea Breeze” will send US warships within sight of Russian ports.

Imagine the response if these acts of provocation, or intimidation, were carried out on America’s borders.
In reclaiming Crimea – which Nikita Kruschev illegally detached from Russia in 1954 – the Russians defended themselves as they have done for almost a century.

More than 90 per cent of the population of Crimea voted to return the territory to Russia. Crimea is the home of the Black Sea Fleet and its loss would mean life or death for the Russian Navy and a prize for Nato.

Confounding the war parties in Washington and Kiev, Vladimir Putin withdrew troops from the Ukrainian border and urged ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine to abandon separatism.
In Orwellian fashion, this has been inverted in the west to the “Russian threat”. Hillary Clinton likened Putin to Hitler.

Without irony, right-wing German commentators said as much. In the media, the Ukrainian neo-Nazis are sanitised as “nationalists” or “ultra nationalists”. What they fear is that Putin is skilfully seeking a diplomatic solution, and may succeed.

On 27 June, responding to Putin’s latest accommodation – his request to the Russian Parliament to rescind legislation that gave him the power to intervene on behalf of Ukraine’s ethnic Russians – Secretary of State John Kerry issued another of his ultimatums.

Russia must “act within the next few hours, literally” to end the revolt in eastern Ukraine. Notwithstanding that Kerry is widely recognised as a buffoon, the serious purpose of these “warnings” is to confer pariah status on Russia and suppress news of the Kiev regime’s war on its own people.
A third of the population of Ukraine are Russian-speaking and bilingual. They have long sought a democratic federation that reflects Ukraine’s ethnic diversity and is both autonomous and independent of Moscow.

Most are neither “separatists” nor “rebels” but citizens who want to live securely in their homeland. Separatism is a reaction to the Kiev junta’s attacks on them, causing as many as 110,000 (UN estimate) to flee across the border into Russia. Typically, they are traumatised women and children.
Like Iraq’s embargoed infants, and Afghanistan’s “liberated” women and girls, terrorised by the CIA’s warlords, these ethnic people of Ukraine are media unpeople in the west, their suffering and the atrocities committed against them minimised, or suppressed.

No sense of the scale of the regime’s assault is reported in the mainstream western media.

This is not unprecedented. Reading again Phillip Knightley’s masterly ‘The First Casualty: the war correspondent as hero, propagandist and mythmaker’, I renewed my admiration for the Manchester Guardian’s Morgan Philips Price, the only western reporter to remain in Russia during the 1917 revolution and report the truth of a disastrous invasion by the western allies.

Fair-minded and courageous, Philips Price alone disturbed what Knightley calls an anti-Russian “dark silence” in the west.
On 2 May, in Odessa, 41 ethnic Russians were burned alive in the trade union headquarters with police standing by.

There is horrifying video evidence. The Right Sector leader Dmytro Yarosh hailed the massacre as “another bright day in our national history”.

In the American and British media, this was reported as a “murky tragedy” resulting from “clashes” between “nationalists” (neo-Nazis) and “separatists” (people collecting signatures for a referendum on a federal Ukraine). The New York Times buried it, having dismissed as Russian propaganda warnings about the fascist and anti-Semitic policies of Washington’s new clients.

The Wall Street Journal damned the victims – “Deadly Ukraine Fire Likely Sparked by Rebels, Government Says”. Obama congratulated the junta for its “restraint”.
On 28 June, the Guardian devoted most of a page to declarations by the Kiev regime’s “president”, the oligarch Petro Poroshenko.  Again, Orwell’s rule of inversion applied.

There was no putsch; no war against Ukraine’s minority; the Russians were to blame for everything. “We want to modernise my country,” said Poroshenko. “We want to introduce freedom, democracy and European values. Somebody doesn’t like that. Somebody doesn’t like us for that.”
According to his report, the Guardian’s reporter, Luke Harding, did not challenge these assertions, or mention the Odessa atrocity, the regime’s air and artillery attacks on residential areas, the killing and kidnapping of journalists, the firebombing of an opposition newspaper and his threat to “free Ukraine from dirt and parasites”.

The enemy are “rebels”, “militants”, “insurgents”, “terrorists” and stooges of the Kremlin. Summon from history the ghosts of Vietnam, Chile, East Timor, southern Africa, Iraq; note the same tags. Palestine is the lodestone of this unchanging deceit.

On 11 July, following the latest Israeli, American equipped slaughter in Gaza – 120 people including six children in one family – an Israeli general writes in the Guardian under the headline, “A necessary show of force”.
In the 1970s, I met Leni Riefenstahl and asked her about her films that glorified the Nazis.

Using revolutionary camera and lighting techniques, she produced a documentary form that mesmerized Germans; it was her ‘Triumph of the Will’ that reputedly cast Hitler’s spell.

I asked her about propaganda in societies that imagined themselves superior. She replied that the “messages” in her films were dependent not on “orders from above” but on a “submissive void” in the German population.

“Did that include the liberal, educated bourgeoisie?” I asked. “Everyone,” she replied, “and of course the intelligentsia.”  Follow John Pilger on twitter @johnpilger

STOP The Banksters New World Order

The R.A.W.W. Scoop

We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and the depth of our answers.

Around Halifax Nova Scotia

Local News and Events

World Awash In Environmental Armageddon

Dedicated to Revealing the True State of the Global Environment

The Extinction Protocol

Geologic and Earthchange News events

Laurel Sobol World Art Guild


Hilary Beaumont

Frequently ask questions

Phoenix Rising from the Gulf

The BP Gulf Oil Spill Revealed


Questions about the holocaust official narrative.


The more you know, the better off you will be...

Martin Truther King

Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?

Galactic Connection

UFO | Ascension | Conspiracy | Spirituality




The End of NWO is NOW!

Underground Documentaries

Free documentaries online


The Fukushima Radiation Tree Reports

On Going Nuclear Apocalypse Threatens The Planet


Exposing USA Perpetrators of COINTELPRO & DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONRY on Citizens from the Ground & Skies


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,325 other followers

%d bloggers like this: