Corrupt Canadian Elections (Vote Fixing)

Corrupt Canadian Elections

(Vote Fixing)

written and witnessed by Daniel J Towsey

updated April 30th 2012

NOTICE; Please read my other article that provides much more information on this issue at,

http://danieltowsey.wordpress.com/category/once-upon-a-time-there-was-a-canada-2/

I wrote this document entitled Remedy for our stolen democracy,

In hopes that you’ll realize that this is information which all Free Canadians need to know, to insure the protection of our democracy.

This statement has previously been released to all members of our Parliament.

This has been read by many people on-line at the Internet’s World Wide Web, at public forums, on line news medias…and more.

  Remedy for Our Stolen Democracy

Dear Citizens: Please read this.

(originally written 2001 and revised after June 30 2002)

We in Canada have a very serious problem with corruption in our voting process.

It has been going on since approximately 1969.(since the use of computers) I witnessed this as a result of working on a federal election campaign.

We have a very old voting system that is extremely flawed. First, it has to be understood how a voting station (polling station) works.

Polling stations are manned by public volunteers from all represented parties. All activities and ballot counting is witnessed by them in the polling stations.

When the polling station closes, the witnesses manually count all ballots for each riding.

Then the results are reported by telephone to an undisclosed location (and local campaign headquarters).

At which time the someone sitting at a computer terminal can enter any vote results he or she feels like entering,

as there are no witnesses present for this process.

In Canada, there is no way to verify those computer results. As, all ballots are blank.

The ballots are useless once the witnesses leave the polling stations.

There is no way to verify the accuracy of the information that is entered in the computer bank.

We have no safe guards against the corruption of vote results.

Most corruption will occur in highly populated areas.

Since these activities will likely not be noticed.

Another thing to realize is that while the votes are being counted, no one knows what the vote count results are at the other polling stations in the riding,

and in this way if the results reported on the television are wrong.

None of the witnesses well be aware of it..

Realize that each riding has many polling stations.

So none of the witnesses really knows what the total vote count is for the riding..

This makes it very easy to corrupt the vote count.

Only the campaign headquarters knows the vote tally.

Please understand that once the witnesses take their eyes off the ballot box and leave the polling station the votes mean nothing.

The witness should be given a document signed by every witness indicating the vote count at that polling station.

Also the vote counts for each polling station should available on line after the election so they can be verified and scrutinized by the witnesses to make sure there is no discrepancies or errors.

This is not the case and that omission proves that that is deliberatly so.

And as I discovered when the fraud happens there is no remedy for it. Who would believe it.

It is to be understood that if even the smallest possibility for vote corruption exists.

Then all possible safe guards should be put in place for the witnesses to eliminate it.

I suggest that we put into place a system where all ballots have a unique UPC bar code on the backside.

Then each polling station would be allotted a predetermined number of ballots.

The location of each and every ballot would be accounted for, through the whole voting process.

The ballots would randomly and anonymously be given out to voters at each polling station.

At the end of the day the used and unused ballots could be counted manually as well as with a computerized counting machine (Scanned with computer).

All activities need to be monitored by the volunteer (public) witnesses.

The ballots will still need to be counted manually. In this way, all ballots will be accounted for in the whole country.

To further safe guard.

I repeat, Each and every volunteer will be given a printed signed copy of the results, to keep, before they leave the polling station.

So that results can be collaborated in the future by the volunteers at an on line site or manually through public records.

There should also be any other security safe guards put in place to ensure that the possibility for corruption never exists again.

Note; The chief reporting electoral officer should have no authority to do any certifying of vote results without public witnesses from the represented parties being present to witness all his certification activities…

Our votes need to be protected. Our democracy starts at the polling stations on the day we vote. Lets make sure it does not stop there!.

I AM A PROUD AND FREE CANADIAN…

Sincerely, Mr. Daniel J Towsey

All truth passes through three stages

First it is ridiculed

Second it is violently opposed (attacked)

Third it is accepted as self evident

Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher1788-1860

Corrupt Canadian Elections [Aug 30 2005].pdf RIGHT CLICK SAVE AS TO DOWNLOAD

Thousands rally in Toronto against 2011 Election Fraud and ‘Robocall’ Scandal -

March 11, 2012

Produced by the Toronto Video Activist Collective (youtube.com/TVACdotCA)
Copyright © 2012 TVAC. All rights reserved.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7H4u2ytIN4

Election Fraud in Canada

The Deception by the Leadership of the COC

and Other Canadian NGO’s re Election Fraud

http://secure.campaigner.com/Campaigner/Public/t.show?R2vU–CWPa-T0KpF6

When will the real activists of Canada realize that the leadership of the CoC
has always been and continues to be the fifth column serving the purpose of
containing and preventing real activism and change. THey do great work in
researching and exposing the evil powers around us (the roll of the fifth
column- to deceive, pretending to be on the side of “good” ) but have never,
never, ever promoted or supported anyone or any group or any party that
committed to ending the evil practices.

They supported the “fluff” and actively campaigned against any one or group

seeking real democratic substantive change.

Like Canada’s major unions, The COC line has always been to sit at the table
with the globalizers drinking tea and eating crumpets, wining and dining,
talking endlessly about amelioration and humanization but going nowhere, except
marching protestors off to Timbuctoo as they did in Ottawa years ago (I was
there) at a globalizers meeting when the COC and Union and other NGO
leadership and the ndp and the environmentalists marched the thousands of
protestors away from the site of the globalist’s meeting and off into nowhere
land.

Many of us did not fall for this trick but instead left the prescribed route
and marched up the hill, stormed the fences anyway, suffering the rubber bullets
and teargas.

The globalists play the song well in tune with our betrayers.

No, David, the COC is not at all “non political”. They are very political indeed
fulfilling Orwell’s double speak language serving the globalist masters.

Note that they only get active in “safe” fights. They are silent on chemtrails;
on smart meters; on the severe radiation hazard of Fukushima and our governments
refusal to protect and inform us citizens of the extent of harm and of
ways to ameliorate it; on Canada’s participation in the crimes against humanity
in the invasions and destruction of and thefts from the Middle East,and of the
murder of innocent civilians there; and most importantly they are silent on the
fraud and outright theft by the financial elite who are stealing with impunity
from the commons and deliberately imposing regimes of impoverishment on the 99 %
(the rest of us.)

It is only when enough of us rise above their deceit converging in common cause
that hope will succeed.

The amazing response of the people is way ahead of the COC. The job of the COC
now is to ensure that that response marches off to Timbuctoo again.

Connie Fogal

Quoting David Creighton <dcr8on@sympatico.ca>:

Good interview (below) Steve!
I know that the CofC is strictly “non-political”, but sometimes—such as when
we may have an actual ‘stolen election’—it may be worth being a little bit
partisan, n’est-ce pas?
Meanwhile, keep up the good work
David
_______

On 09-03-2012, at 7:03 PM, Council of Canadians wrote:

Dear Council of Canadians supporter,

It’s only been one week since we launched our national survey on election
fraud but already the response has been amazing!

The Council of Canadians has received hundreds of reports, with claims of
deceptive and harassing phone calls coming in from concerned voters right
across the country. We’ve been able to get our message out even further
through the media, including nationally televised interviews (you can watch
these below). And new reports are coming in every day.

Thank you to everyone who has already filled out our survey. If you haven’t
yet, click here to do so now. You’re directly helping to expose the nature
and extent of these dirty tricks, and identify federal ridings where voter
deception or interference may have influenced election results.

Voters and candidates in a given riding can apply to defend their legal
rights under the Canada Elections Act. However, there may be an urgency to
act if sufficient knowledge has been gained of such attempts to deceive or interfere.

“Canadians need to understand their rights in the Act”, says Jean-Pierre
Kingsley, Canada’s former Chief Electoral Officer. “If an individual elector
in a riding feels that there has been an irregularity, fraud, corruption or
illegal practice that has affected the result, they can launch a legal action
to annul the result. It’s great that the Council of Canadians is working to
inform Canadians of this right.”
The Council is now analyzing all survey results by riding to determine next
steps, including the possibility of supporting applicants who wish to pursue
egal action. Ridings of particular interest have emerged, including:
Nipissing-Timiskaming – margin of victory = 18 votes
Etobicoke Centre – margin of victory = 26 votes
Yukon – margin of victory = 132 votes
Elmwood-Transcona – margin of victory = 300 votes
Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar – margin of victory = 538 votes
Mississauga East-Cooksville – margin of victory = 676 votes
Winnipeg South Centre – margin of victory = 722 votes
Don Valley East – margin of victory = 870 votes
Willowdale – margin of victory = 932 votes
Vancouver Island North – margin of victory = 1,827 votes
Kitchener Waterloo – margin of victory = 2,144 votes
South Shore-St. Margaret’s – margin of victory = 2,915 votes
Eglinton-Lawrence – margin of victory = 4,062 votes
We need your help and here are two ways you can right now:

1 – Please fill out our survey now. If you know someone else who received
fraudulent or misleading information around the 2011 federal election,
particularly in one of these ridings, please forward this on to them too.

2 – Make a donation now to help keep our Election Fraud Campaign moving
forward. And if you’re not yet a member of the Council of Canadians, join
today!

It’s thanks to your support that the Council of Canadians is able to take a
lead role in this crucial issue. Working together as Canada’s largest
citizens advocacy group, we will vigorously defend this most fundamental of
our democratic rights.

Thank you,

Garry Neil
Executive Director
The Council of Canadians

See below to watch national media coverage of the Council’s election fraud
campaign. And remember to fill out our survey at
www.canadians.org/election/survey/.

VIDEO: Robocalls: CTV News Channel: Garry Neil, executive
director, March
1, 2012

VIDEO: Robocalled legal rights. Steven Shrybman, a lawyer for
the Council
of Canadians, discusses how Canadians affected by fraudulent phone calls
during the last federal election can assert their legal rights, CBC Power &
Politics, March 1, 1012