Also please read related articles
written by Daniel J Towsey
Why get a flu shot when it can only protect you from previous years flus?
To get the anti-virus for the flu, you have to be injected with other year’s flu viruses.
They can not predict the flu virus strain that well come out in the future.
The whole thing is a scam.
I suspect that anyone who gets a flu shot becomes infectious and spreads the flu.
I would not be surprised if they are creating the new flu viruses that
come out every year in their laboratories, as part of the flu shot, so they would spread the flu,
But they themselves would not get sick because they themselves will never take the flu shots, knowing that they are the ones who created the virus in the first place.
This would be a great marketing ploy.
This way anyone who has not got the flu shot will catch the flu from someone who did take the flu shot.
This will further make people believe they actually need the flu shot.
You need to understand that the flu is transfered through the air.
So if you are the only person in your office that did not get the shot.
You will surely get sick and catch the flu from someone else.
Then everyone else including you will then believe that you should of taken the flu shot and that would of protected you.
Since the flu shot contains the anti-virus for the new flu they created, most times only ones who did not get the shot would get sick.
So are you understanding what I am saying?
Anyone who receives the flu shot will become highly infectious and will spread it to others who did not get the shot.
This will make more profits for the pharmaceutical company.
I know of many people who took the shot and two weeks later came down with the flu. (the incubation period for the flu shots is two weeks)
Now here is another thought. If the flu shot,
which is given to 98 million Americans is truly effective.
Why is there more people getting the flu every year?
The Pharmaceutical companies claim that they use only dead flu viruses for their culture to make the anti-flu Serum.
A virus is a living organism,
so how can they say it is dead. It is not a virus if its dead.
It has to be alive to multiply and make the large batches.
I believe that these viruses and all viruses are man made and do not exist in the natural world.
People then to equate a cold as the flu.
Colds are not related to flus. Colds occur from over exposure to cold air.
Staying indoors from several weeks and staying out of the cold weather will always cure the common cold.
So then what is a flu?
It is man made and only comes into existence after the general public is fooled into believing that they need these anti flu shots.
Get a shot and then everyone starts getting sick from it.
What a criminal operation.
Daniel J Towsey July 11, 2006
Dec 8, 2016 SOBERING WARNING: Healthcare worker in Georgia gives warning
This is probably the most sobering message you will ever see. This young lady reveals what is happening in the medical community in AMERICA right NOW! This video will let you see how close we are to the end! Will you compromise!
Part 2: Flu Shot Humanicide Plot
This is not alternative health conspiratorial conjecture. This has been officially recorded but barely reported. So here is a sampling of recorded disease breakouts among children who were vaccinated for that disease.
Enforcing or increasing vaccine schedules does not really prevent disease; it only increases the chances of worse health or gravely critical adverse reactions, ranging from autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) to decreased immunity and increased poor health.
Some Known Outbreaks of Vaccinated Kids
The most recent outbreak occurred in California. The disease was whooping cough, or pertussis. The vaccination that has become a regularly scheduled pediatric ritual is a combination of three vaccines known as DTaP or DTP, which stands for Diptheria – Tetenus – acellular Pertussis.
This three-in-one vaccine cocktail is supposed to prevent diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, or whooping cough. The pediatric vaccination schedule calls for administering this cocktail at two, four, six, and 15-18 months of age. Four vaccinations of three vaccines each administered to children before one and one-half years of age.
After examining the records of those stricken with pertussis over an eight month period, Dr. Witt and his team were surprised to learn that the vast majority, 81 percent, of the whooping cough kids had received their full four shot battery of DTaPs or pertussis vaccines alone.
Eleven percent of the pertussis victims received some less than four pertusssis vaccinations, while the remaining eight percent were never vaccinated for whooping cough at all.
Please pause and reflect. There’s something obviously wrong with this. Other recent pertussis outbreaks were blindly blamed on unvaccinated kids contaminating vaccinated children, without any investigation.
That, even if true, which Dr. Witt’s survey indicates is not, is something to think about. Vaccinations are supposed to confer immunity, right? This study implies that vaccinated children are infecting the unvaccinated.
The New York Times also reported on this overall trend with their headline “Vaccination Is Steady but Pertussis Is Surging.”
It wasn’t long ago that the New York and New Jersey area had a mumps outbreak. Eighty percent of those kids had been fully vaccinated with the MMR series (measles, mumps, rubella). (Natural News, source below)
In Canada, four studies conducted in 2009 suggested a link with the seasonal flu vaccines’ increasing swine flu or H1H1 infection by up to 250 percent. (Science Daily, source below)
Hiding the Vaccine Dirt Under the Media Rug
Realize that vaccines are inexpensive to produce and do not undergo long term testing. They are being promoted and enforced by state legislators and school districts at the behest of pharmaceutical lobbies. Sometimes money changes hands from Big Pharma to politicians.
But much social enforcement occurs by guilt from the media and medical profession. The mantra of avoiding vaccinations furthers epidemics because “herd immunity” is only granted by vaccinating at least 90 percent of a population — is nonsense.
Meanwhile, the vaccine manufacturers are protected from liability by the government’s federal National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) established after a rash of lawsuits from extreme neurological side effects caused by 1980s swine flu vaccines.
This “Vaccine Court” compensates the vaccine injured directly with federal funds and small taxes collected from vaccine manufacturers. It also hides actual cases by not releasing press releases to the lamestream media.
VAERS (vaccine adverse effect reporting system) is another bad joke. It’s estimated that less than five percent of vaccine adverse events get reported, and very few of those hit the MSM. This one did once, years ago – CBS 60 Minutes Documentary.
Learn how dangerous vaccines are
In my experience of 27 years with hundreds of unvaccinated
children in my practice, they fared better than
their vaccinated peers by any measure of physical and emotional
health that you would care to use.
And I’ve had mothers with both vaccinated and unvaccinated
children in the same family tell me the same thing.
Part 1: Investigative reporter reveals deadly bird flu contaminant in flu vaccine.
Please click on the LARGE SCREEN icon [__] at the bottom right corner of the screen.
This Free DVD Warns of Vaccine Dangers even greater than are known by health advocates.
This 6-part DVD is a montage compiled from various DVD documentaries.
This DVD is designed to alert people as to the deadly nature of the coming flu shot.
If and when we are told that the flu shot is mandatory, you will need to see the documentation presented in this DVD in order to defy all threats of punishment for refusing this flu shot.
This DVD documents the fact that the flu shot is a key weapon in the plan to depopulate the world, as explained in the following report:
I offer to freely lend this 6-hour DVD, as a humanitarian service, to those who want to see solid and voluminous evidence that there is a depopulation agenda underlying the corporate mass media’s push for nationwide flu shots.
Secret government documents reveal vaccines to be a total hoax
Ethan A. HufF Natural News Jan 8, 2013
If you have children, you are more than likely already aware of the official U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “Immunization Schedules,” which today recommend an astounding 29 vaccines be given between birth and six years of age, including yearly flu shots, as well as another five to 16 vaccines between ages seven and 18 (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/). But a recent investigative report compiled by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D., uncovers more than 30 years of hidden government documents exposing these vaccine schedules as a complete hoax, not to mention the fraud of the vaccines themselves to provide any real protection against disease.
Though her paper focuses primarily on the British health system’s elaborate cover-up of the dirty truth about its own national vaccination program, the tenets of the study’s findings still apply to vaccination schedules in general, which are typically designed for the purpose of serving corporate interests rather than public health. Government authorities, it turns out, in an ongoing bid to satisfy the private goals of the vaccine industry, have deliberately covered up pertinent information about the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines from parents in order to maintain a high rate of vaccination compliance. And in the process, they have put countless millions of children at risk of serious side effects and death.
You can access Dr. Tomljenovic’s full paper here:
Hiding the truth and covering up data to encourage vaccine compliance
Through several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, Dr. Tomljenovic was able to obtain transcripts of private meetings that were held between the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI), a so-called “independent expert advisory committee” that makes recommendations to the government about vaccine policy, and various British health ministers over the years. And after poring through this plethora of information, which had previously been veiled from public view, Dr. Tomljenovic made some disturbing discoveries.
“[T]he JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization) made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for ‘herd immunity,’ a concept which … does not rest on solid scientific evidence,” explains Dr. Tomljenovic in the introduction to her paper.
“Official documents obtained from the U.K. Department of Health (DH) and the JCVI reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.”
These are some strong accusations, but the information Dr. Tomljenovic gathered speaks for itself. Not only did the JCVI routinely ignore questions of safety as they came up with regards to the ever-expanding vaccination schedule, but the group actively censored unfavorable data that shed a “negative” light on vaccines in order to maintain the illusion that vaccines are safe and effective. Beyond this, the JCVI regularly lied to both the public and government authorities about vaccine safety in order to ensure that people continued to vaccinate their kids.
You can access Dr. Tomljenovic’s full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf RIGHT CLICK TO DOWNLOAD
JCVI was fully aware of MMR vaccine dangers as early as 1989, but covered them up
Beginning on page three of her report, Dr. Tomljenovic begins outlining the sordid details of meetings held as early as 1981 where the JCVI clearly engaged in fraud, cover-up, and lies about vaccines to protect the vaccine industry, not children, from harm. Minutes from these meetings reveal that the JCVI actively tried to cover up severe side effects associated with common vaccines like measles and whooping cough (pertussis), both of which were clearly linked at the time to causing severe brain damage in a substantial percentage of the children that received them.
Of particular concern was how the JCVI handled unfavorable data on the controversial MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella. 10 years before Dr. Andrew Wakefield published his study on MMR in The Lancet, JCVI was already fully aware that the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control(NIBSC) had identified a clear link between MMR and vaccine-induced meningitis and encephalitis. But rather than come forward with this information and call for further safety assessments on the vaccine, the JCVI instead censored this critical information from the public, and blatantly lied about the safety of MMR for years.
“The extent of the JCVI’s concerns with the implications of scientific assessment of vaccine safety on vaccine policy explains why they were opposed to any long-term surveillance for severe neurological disorders following vaccination,” writes Dr. Tomljenovic. “[I]nstead of re-evaluating the vaccination policy, at least until safety concerns were fully evaluated, the JCVI chose to support the existing policy based on incomplete evidence that was available at that time.”
In other words, the JCVI was more concerned with protecting the reputation of the dangerous MMR vaccine, as well as many other questionable vaccines, than with protecting children from sustaining serious injuries as a result of getting the jabs. As far as the MMR vaccine is concerned, this critical piece of information not only reinforces the legitimacy of Dr. Wakefield’s findings from 10 years later, which were illegitimately declared to be fraudulent by the establishment, but also illustrates just how painfully long this scam has been taking place.
Vaccine companies urged to manipulate data sheets, skew safety studies to promote vaccines
If this is not bad enough, Dr. Tomljenovic also drudged up copious amounts of information on the JCVI’s longtime habit of encouraging vaccine companies to deliberately alter their data sheets in order to make dangerous and ineffective vaccines appear safe and effective, in accordance with their recommendations. When the JCVI’s guidance contraindications for MMR, for instance, did not match those of the vaccine’s manufacturer, JCVI apparently instructed the manufacturer to alter its data sheets to avoid “legal problems.”
Similarly, the JCVI’s official policy was to cherry-pick unreliable studies to support its own opinions on vaccines rather than rely on independent, scientifically-sound studies to make vaccine policy recommendations. Once again, the JCVI’s position on the safety and effectiveness of MMR is an excellent example of this, as the group flat out ignored legitimate MMR studies in favor of industry-backed junk studies like the infamous 2005 Cochrane Review, which technically proves nothing about the alleged safety of MMR because the 31 studies it evaluated did not even meet the group’s basic methodological criteria.
“Over the years, the JCVI has consistently promoted the MMR vaccine as safe, based on studies that have been proven to be either irrelevant, inconclusive, or methodologically questionable,” explains Dr. Tomljenovic, adding that the JCVI routinely chose to rely on flawed epidemiological studies that only identified “association” rather than “causation,” a rather ironic inaccuracy in light of how scrutinizing the establishment typically is of studies that contradict its own positions.
The eye-opening, 45-page paper goes on to explain how vaccine schedules were established through the calculated downplaying of vaccine safety concerns and the over-inflating of vaccine benefits; the promotion of dangerous new vaccines into the pediatric schedule through deception; the discouraging of vaccine safety follow-up studies; and the widespread brainwashing of the public through manipulation and scientific sleight-of-hand tricks.
Be sure to check out the complete study for yourself:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf RIGHT CLICK TO DOWNLOAD
Sources for this article include:
Duanne Luckow says Daniel, this informaton is right on target with your above article on shots.
Shingles are another example of older people going to get the shot and they get shingles within
the two week period. Blessings for exposing the truth
Vendaval Mills says, soon it won’t matter. there will be no choice to make. DARPA is working on
a vaccine chip that fits within a human cell and capable of receiving and responding to outside
communications. Hell yeah, I’m scared.
Deborah Braswell says Good post, Daniel, shared this!
10 REASONS WHY FLU SHOTS ARE MORE DANGEROUS THAN A FLU
What’s In A Flu Shot
Uploaded on Sep 29, 2006
Funny clip regarding the ingredients in a flu shot. This is a serious issue though. I believe the clip is from Royal Canadian Air Farce broadcast on CBC.?
Flu Vaccine Exposed: Think Twice!
Uploaded on Aug 13, 2008
Studies show that flu vaccines are unsafe and ineffective. This uncensored presentation by the Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute (www.thinktwice.com) includes a visual depiction of flu vaccine production — how the flu vaccine is made and what it contains! A natural alternative to flu vaccines is provided. [For more information about vaccines, become a FAN of Thinktwice on Facebook.]
This one is more educational.