911 WTC Planes Videos Proven To Be Fake

written by A Truth Soldier

Be sure to check out

http://911JusticeHalifax.wordpress.com

for everything about 911

Here are my other 911 articles

https://danieltowsey.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/the-gray-plane-that-no-one-saw/
https://danieltowsey.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/halifax-nova-scotias-connection-to-911/
https://danieltowsey.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/the-911-pentagon-light-pole-props-for-the-big-show/
https://danieltowsey.wordpress.com/2011/11/25/911-wtc-planes-videos-proven-to-be-fake/

https://danieltowsey.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/how-to-rip-off-your-lease-and-make-billions/

Here is the Halifax facebook http://www.facebook.com/911JusticeHalifax

This video and pictures will explain how the videos shown on television were faked

First watch the video and then run the slideshow of the images below. You will be amazed at what you

did not notice when you look at the stills from the video. Then I am sure you will want to watch

the video again and see the obvious things you did not notice the first time.

If you scroll way down, you will see stills from another video shows the missile painted as a commercial

aircraft used for the Pentagon 911 show.

below the videos you can see and can download the still pictures from the video

CLICK ON FIRST IMAGE FOR FULL SIZED SLIDE-SHOW.

Further down below the pictures you will find the full original video.

Previously published related article. https://danieltowsey.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/the-gray-plane-that-no-one-saw/

and do not miss these two 911 articles.

https://danieltowsey.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/how-to-rip-off-your-lease-and-make-billions/  

https://danieltowsey.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/the-911-pentagon-light-pole-props-for-the-big-show/

Here is another video that proves what was used at WTC was not an airplane.

THIS IS WHAT REALLY HAPPENED ON 9/11!!! 100% TRUTh

Part 1

PART 2

SEPTEMBER CLUES : Definitive Edition | 2008 (FULL VERSION)

ACARS Confirmed – 9/11 Aircraft Airborne Long After Crash 

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1448/244/NL/ACARS_Confirmed_-_9_11_Aircraft_Airborne_Long_After_Crash.html 

CLICK ON FIRST IMAGE

I highly recommend you watch this video and follow the links to all the evidence of Nuclear Devices ( suitcase nukes) used to bring down the three WTC Buildings

Dimitri Khalezov 911 video – the most prohibited item on the web

This is the intro to the most censored video on the web.
and the powers that be DO NOT want you to watch this

If you want answers to the 911 mystery watch –

” Dimitri Khalezov – WTC Nuclear demolition “

for the full video go here :


(Part 1 of 2 Full)

Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov, former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union. Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976 between the USA and the former USSR and Dimitri’s military role in the USSR’s Nuclear Intelligence division, Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition schema, which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York (i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition schema). Dimitri uses his insider information combined with his military background to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered.

In Part 1, Dimitri explains:
– Dimitri Khalezov background
– Planes and explosions
– Pentagon mentioned (explained fully in Part 2)
– Nuclear detonations explained
– WTC1 & WTC2 nuclear demolition

——————————————————
Support Evidence for Dimitri’s Testimony
http://ac31.blogspot.com/2011/09/support-ing-evidence-for-dimitri.html

——————————————————
9/11 – Who did it? – Dimitri Khalezov

1) Dimitri interview where he identifies the perpetrator:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm

“The man who planned 9/11, his name is Mike Harari (now 82 or 83 years old) who is a retired counterintelligence specialist and former Deputy Chief of the Mossad ….”

2) Excellent interview with Jim Fetzer where Dimitri discusses Mike Harari and why Mike wanted to meet Dimitri:

Part 2 of 2 is here:
http://www.youtube.com/anthonyc31?v=c39O-ftZboU%5B/embed%5D

Discussion on Alex Jones/Prison Planet that got me BANNED:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55786486

——————————————————
Edits to original interview include:
– combined 26 parts into 2 parts (2 hours each)
– sped up the video by 20% (kept it slow where you have to read)
– increased the volume
– changed the background music
– chopped off the bumper music between clips
– Content: added 10 minutes of support material from: 911 Coincidences regarding WTC7 (lady commentator), Alex Jones/Mancow discussing Rumsfeld interview and his denial of knowing anything about WTC7, support material about 900+ rescue workers (out of 10,000) getting sick with cancer, and an interview with the chopper cameraman that filmed “Nose Out” video claiming he did not see a plane himself
– Content: removed the FBI section at the beginning because it delayed getting to the good information

Original 26 part interview can be found here along with all evidence presented:
http://www.911-truth.net
9/11: The Third Truth – Dimitri Khalezov (2of2 Full)

Uploaded by anthonyc31 on May 6, 2011

(Part 2 of 2 Full)

Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov, former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union. Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976 between the USA and the former USSR and Dimitri’s military role in the USSR’s Nuclear Intelligence division, Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition schema, which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York (i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition schema). Dimitri uses this insider information combined with his military background to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered.

In this Part 2, Dimitri explains:
– WTC 7
– Ground Zero definition
– Pentagon missile attack in detail
– Seismic readings
– 911 media manipulation
– F93 crash in Shanksville, PA
– Cell phone calls
– Hijackers
– 911 rescue workers and illness
– Ground Zero cleanup

Part 1 of 2 is here:
http://www.youtube.com/anthonyc31?v=vNuKAdGlxFo

Another excellent interview is with Jim Fetzer where Dimitri explains “who did it” and why the culprits became interested in meeting with him. The entire interview is excellent but Part 10 is where Dimitri discuss “who did it”:

——————————————————

Original 26 part interview can be found here along with all evidence presented:
http://www.911-truth.net

http://nucleardemolition.com/
http://nucleardemolition.com/GZero_Report.pdf   RIGHT CLICK SAVE AS
http://www.dimitri-khalezov-video.com/
http://www.911-truth.net/
http://www.dimitri-khalezov-video.com/911thology_Dimitri_Khalezov_video-DVD_download_links.htm

2011 Undeniable new 9/11 WTC DRONE PLANE PROOF (NOT UA 175) MILITARY PLANE

PROOF ‘PLANE’ WAS HOLOGRAM THAT HIT 9/11

Totally fake! But you would still believe it!

911 is a lie

9/11 WTC – Biggest Gold Heist in History: ~ $300 Billion in Gold Bars

Gold Of Nova Scotia Discovered At WTC 10/31/01

This picture is at WTC showing the small cruise missile engine on the ground.

2012 – NEWEST 9/11 DOCUMENTARY –

PROOF 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.mp4

Uploaded by on Jan 4, 2012

Thanks to “Xendrius” for another Outstanding Documentary !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jazdG3-ZETM

READERS COMMENTS

Drew
Andrewman12@yahoo.com
24.175.227.148

Hi. Mr. Towsey

Debunkers are trying harder than ever to invalidate analysis by attacking personal credibility of researchers. They are also stating that identifiable remains of all 40 Flight 93 victims and 179 of the 184 Pentagon victims have been returned to their families. Unless they had DNA on all these people, they needed to recover a lot skulls for dental records of which I have never seen.

I respect that debate, but they need to show clear data of those findings to shut everyone up. As we also are attempting to show clearly that if a plane hit the WTC and left it’s wing impact destruction, then those occurrences disambiguate themselves from the Pentagon scenario where the engines would have hit first, but left no impact destruction whatsoever, or show wing impact damage either. Just a 16′ hole.

If this was a cover up, then yes it was arranged far in advance. The so called evidence would have to be planted because there is no way they could have actioned this scenario twice. Little scraps of debris. No large wing or tail sections that could have possibly entered the Pentagon, or Wtc for that matter, without breaking off in large sections.

It is almost pointless to post YouTube vids anymore bc the Internet is inundated with disinfo agents and Tin Foil haters looking for any reason to discredit. The scenarios I listed above are what the Tin Foil haters can’t answer, but as long as they have “identified” remains they still work the angle of Commercial Airplanes which not one single video unequivocally demonstrates.

So in the end of the day, we are merely taking the 9/11 Commission at it’s word that Flight 11 and 175 were flown by amateurs with exact precision through the Manhattan skyline without fail and no deviation of target. Truly a miracle scenario. An elaborate hoax baffling the senses of all people.

 

17 thoughts on “911 WTC Planes Videos Proven To Be Fake”

  1. probably the most retarded thing I have ever seen. Your attempts at conspiracy theory authorship are truly pathetic. Did you really try to film your monitor, and then talk about someone else’s poor video editing abilities? You need some more tinfoil for your hat, because the alien mind control rays are obviously having an adverse effect on your critical thinking abilities.
    Buying a camera does not make you a visionary photographer.

    Like

    1. Yah you have to be retarded not to see to obvious…The stills were done by screen capture and they clearly show the details..Why would I need to do any video editing to show the obvious? My videos were just to help to understand and see the details in the stills…Yah again I have to agree with you the whole 911 official story is retarded…

      Like

  2. wow… i’m bored today. Couple comments on your “years of research”…. first of all, you wasted them. in the begining of your video you state that if you “take the measurements of this building, and the measurements of a commercial airliner, you’ll probably find that the commercial airliner is a lot wider than this building…” Probably? Seriously? “years of research”, and you got “probably”? let me help you out. world trade center’s twin towers, 208 feet by 208 feet. the wingspan of a Boeing 767-222 (the model in question) is 156 feet, and a length of 159 feet… small enough to fit completely inside the outer walls of the tower. You also state that “most commercial aircraft of that day had 4 engines instead of 2”. Pretty blanket statement considering the large range of sizes in aircraft that are used by commercial airlines, but luckily, we know the model in question. Boeing 767 models are 2 engine aircraft. Did you even try to research this stuff?

    I was wondering about the logic behind your choice of accompaniment videos to share with this riveting expose… You claim to prove beyond a doubt that there was no plane at all, yet also post a video that instead argues that the plane was not civilian, but military. The video contains dozens of eyewitness accounts, questioning not the existence of a plane, but whether it was commercial or not. you provided prove that you’re full of shit (or a moron).

    I really could go on buddy. the laundry list of stupid shit you say in that video is mind boggling.

    Like

    1. Good comment you made..to bad you did not get my not so subtle message..There were no airplanes.. But hey you gave me a great idea.. I will look for the pictures I found many years ago of a cruise missile painted as a commercial aircraft.. You see, from a far distance it is very easy for people to see a cruise missile as an airplane… Since it is flying and dose have wings.. So with your cleverness.. Have you found even one picture of WTC 911 that shows a commercial aircraft? Humm I am sure you did not as it never happened.. 911 WTC has to of been the most photographed and video taped event in human history..Yet not one video or picture showing a commercial aircraft..jeeeezz do you think maybe it is because there was none..duhhh

      So now you provide sizes of the WTC and you assume to know what (plane) hit it… But can you provide us a link to where you got your information so we can all have a look at it…

      If you were to do some research you would soon find the the so called terrorists that were flying the planes were alive and well after 911. oh and planes they claimed were used on 911 were proven through their serial numbers that they were still in service and flying around for many years after 911..

      By the way..I never bothered to get the measurements of the wtc as I know there were no airplanes used on 911… Have yous seen the picture of the cruise missile engine that landed on the ground and was photographed by many people? Especially take notice of the cop standing beside it..That picture shows how small the engine was…

      Like

      1. I “assume” to know what plane hit? If you’re going to try to disprove the official story (which, btw, i never said i buy) why don’t we use the aircraft from the official story? only makes sense. surprised you were never once curious about that in your “years of research. United Airlines Flight 175 was a Boeing 767-222. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_175

        Like i said, I’ve never said that I completely buy the “official story”, but your conspiracy theory is completely out to lunch. If it was a cruise missile, you would never have caught it on camera at all, without high speed video, and I have never seen any high speed video of that event.

        Like

        1. Oh so you say that no regular video camera would be able to video tape a cruise missile flying..that is nuts..A high speed video camera..oh what is that? There is no such thing… Your thinking of the days when they used film cameras..

          Long ago it was proven that the jets that were claimed to of been used on 911 were still flying.. That was discovered through their serial numbers…

          Anyway…please stop leaving your time wasting comments… I will not waste any more time on them..

          Like

        2. ACARS Confirmed – 9/11 Aircraft Airborne Long After Crash. http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1448/244/NL/ACARS_Confirmed_-_9_11_Aircraft_Airborne_Long_After_Crash.html?currentSplittedPage=2
          UNITED 175 IN THE VICINITY OF HARRISBURG AND PITTSBURGH, PA

          (PilotsFor911Truth.org) – Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) is a device used to send messages to and from an aircraft. Very similar to text messages and email we use today, Air Traffic Control, the airline itself, and other airplanes can communicate with each other via this “texting” system. ACARS was developed in 1978 and is still used today. Similar to cell phone networks, the ACARS network has remote ground stations installed around the world to route messages from ATC, the airline, etc, to the aircraft depending on it’s location and vice versa. ACARS Messages have been provided through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) which demonstrate that the aircraft received messages through ground stations located in Harrisburg, PA, and then later routed through a ground station in Pittsburgh, 20 minutes after the aircraft allegedly impacted the South Tower in New York. How can messages be routed through such remote locations if the aircraft was in NY, not to mention how can messages be routed to an aircraft which allegedly crashed 20 minutes earlier? Pilots For 9/11 Truth have briefly touched on this subject in 9/11: Intercepted through the excellent research of “Woody Box”, who initially discovered such alarming information in the released FOIA documents(1). We now have further information which confirms the aircraft was not in the vicinity of New York City when the attacks occurred.

          These are the ‘text’ (ACARS) messages in question –

          The format for these messages is pretty straight forward. To limit the technical details, we will explain the most important parts of the messages, however, for full Message Block Format Code standards, click here. The remote ground station (MDT in the message below) used to route the message to the aircraft, the time and date in which the message is sent (111259, meaning the 11th of Sept, at 1259Z or 0859 Eastern), the flight number (UA175), and the tail number of the airplane in which the message is intended (N612UA), are all highlighted in red. The underlined date and time is when the message was received by the airplane.

          This message was sent on Sept 11, at 1259Z (8:59AM Eastern) to United Flight 175, tail number N612UA, routed through the MDT remote ground station (Harrisburg International Airport, also known as Middleton).

          DDLXCXA SFOLM CHI58R SFOFRSAM
          .SFOLMUA 111259/JER
          CMD
          AN N612UA/GL MDT
          – QUSFOLMUA 1UA175 BOSLAX
          I HEARD OF A REPORTED INCIDENT ABOARD YOUR ACFT. PLZ VERIFY ALL
          IS NORMAL….THX 777SAM
          SFOLM JERRY TSEN

          ;09111259 108575 0543

          This message was sent on Sept 11, at 1303Z (9:03AM Eastern, the time of the crash) to United Flight 175, tail number N612UA, routed through the MDT remote ground station (Harrisburg International Airport, also known as Middleton).

          DDLXCXA CHIAK CH158R
          .CHIAKUA 111303/ED
          CMD
          AN N612UA/GL MDT
          – QUCHIYRUA 1UA175 BOSLAX
          – MESSAGE FROM CHIDD –
          HOW IS THE RIDE. ANY THING DISPATCH CAN DO FOR YOU…
          CHIDD ED BALLINGER

          ;09111303 108575 0545

          This message was also sent on Sept 11, at 1303Z (9:03AM Eastern, the time of the crash) to United Flight 175, tail number N612UA, routed through the MDT remote ground station (Harrisburg International Airport, also known as Middleton).

          DDLXCXA CHIYR CH158R
          .CHIYRUA 111303/AD
          CMD
          AN N612UA/GL MDT
          – QUCHIYRUA 1UA175 BOSLAX
          – MESSAGE FROM CHIDD –
          NY APROACH LOOKIN FOR YA ON 127.4
          CHIDD AD ROGERS

          ;09111303 108575 0546

          This message was sent on Sept 11, at 1323Z (9:23AM Eastern, 20 minutes after the time of the crash) to United Flight 175, tail number N612UA, routed through the PIT remote ground station (Pittsburgh International Airport).

          DDLXCXA CHIAK CH158R
          .CHIAKUA DA 111323/ED
          CMD
          AN N612UA/GL PIT
          – QUCHIYRUA 1UA175 BOSLAX
          – MESSAGE FROM CHIDD –
          /BEWARE ANY COCKPIT INTROUSION: TWO AIRCAFT IN NY . HIT TRADE C
          NTER BUILDS…
          CHIDD ED BALLINGER

          ;09111323 108575 0574

          If one references the standard message block codes linked above, you will notice that a “Technical Acknowledgement” section should be present in ACARS messages. What this means, is that the ACARS system can confirm if the sent ‘text’ messages have been received or not without requiring any crew input to manually acknowledge the message was received. Similar to an email which may have bounced back, or your cell phone telling you that your text message failed to send, this automatic technical acknowledgement would let the reader know the message failed receipt, or if it were received. An ACK or NAK should be present denoting received or failed, respectively, according to standard message formats. Unfortunately, these standard codes are not available in the above messages. However, according to a Memorandum For The Record(2) quoting United Dispatcher Ed Ballinger, the second time stamp on the bottom of the message, at United Airlines, is the “Technical Acknowledgement” from the airplane that the message has been received –

          Mr. Ballinger stated that the ACARS messages have two times listed: the time sent and the time received. He stated that once he sends the message it is delivered to the addressed aircraft through AIRINC immediately. He is not aware of any delay in the aircraft receiving the message after he sends it.

          According to the above statement made by Mr. Ballinger, all of the above messages were received by the aircraft.

          The 9/11 Commission has claimed which messages have been received by the aircraft. According to a another Memorandum For The Record (MFR), four ACARS messages were sent between 8:59AM and 9:03AM on the morning of Sept 11, to United Flight 175. The MFR reads as follows(3) –

          1259:19Z A dispatcher-initiated message that reached the plane but not crew acknowledged stating “I heard of a reported incident.”
          1259:29 Additional dispatcher-initiated message
          1259:30 Additional dispatcher-initiated message
          1303:17 Rogers-initiated message not received by the aircraft

          The first message at 1259:19Z, as stated, was received by the aircraft, but not crew acknowledged, which is not required as technical acknowledgements are automatic. This is referring to the message noted above sent through MDT by Jerry TSEN (First coded ACARS message at top). The second (1259:29Z) and third messages (1259:30Z) referenced in the MFR were not provided through the FOIA. The last message (1303:17Z) referenced in the MFR is claimed to not have been received by the aircraft according to the 9/11 Commission. However, all we have is their word, which contradicts the statement made by Ballinger and the Technical Acknowledgement time stamp. The coded Rogers initiated ACARS message is included above, third from the top. Of course, the 9/11 Commission cannot admit if the last message was received by the airplane as that would immediately indicate to anyone that the airplane did not crash into the South Tower at 09:03am.

          It is interesting to note that the Commission ignores the 9:03am ACARS message sent by Ed Ballinger routed through MDT (second ACARS message printed above), yet claims the 9:03am message sent by Rogers as not being received. Based on sequential numbers of the messages themselves, it is clear Ballinger’s 9:03 message was sent before the Rogers message (0545 for Ballinger message, 0546 for Rogers, printed on bottom of the message), yet the Commission ignores Ballinger’s message. Why would they ignore Ballinger’s message, yet acknowledge Rogers? Is it because Ballinger’s message was received by the airplane and they realized that an aircraft cannot receive an ACARS message at that distance and such low altitude? This message is more evidence the aircraft was in the vicinity of Harrisburg, and not NY. At least 3 ACARS messages were routed through MDT between 8:59 and 9:03am, and received by the airplane, according to the technical acknowledgement time stamps at the bottom of the messages.

          The last message sent at 9:23AM, routed through Pittsburgh, has been completely ignored by the 9/11 Commission as well. Although important to know whether the messages were received, it is equally if not more important to understand how they are routed, received or not.

          ACARS Networks are based on ARINC Standards for communications in the United States. ARINC is a provider of the communication protocol for ACARS networking. As ACARS networks are to Cell Phones, think of ARINC as perhaps a Verizon or AT&T. When a message is sent from the aircraft, or the ground, the message needs to be routed through remote ground stations as described above. Many remote ground stations (RGS) are located throughout the world. Here is a diagram of some of the stations located in the Northeast USA.

          Click To Enlarge

          Comprehensive List Of ACARS Remote Ground Stations Worldwide – scribd source link – Page 100

          If you get on an airplane in say Chicago, headed for NY, you turn off your cell phone and off you go. When you arrive in NY, you turn on your cell phone and see you have a message waiting. Was this message routed through a cell tower in Chicago? No, you would never receive it, nor be alerted that you have a message waiting. It is routed through a cell tower in NY. How does the cell network know where you are? MORE HERE

          Like

  3. Hi. Mr. Towsey

    Debunkers are trying harder than ever to invalidate analysis by attacking personal credibility of researchers. They are also stating that identifiable remains of all 40 Flight 93 victims and 179 of the 184 Pentagon victims have been returned to their families. Unless they had DNA on all these people, they needed to recover a lot skulls for dental records of which I have never seen.

    I respect that debate, but they need to show clear data of those findings to shut everyone up. As we also are attempting to show clearly that if a plane hit the WTC and left it’s wing impact destruction, then those occurrences disambiguate themselves from the Pentagon scenario where the engines would have hit first, but left no impact destruction whatsoever, or show wing impact damage either. Just a 16′ hole.

    If this was a cover up, then yes it was arranged far in advance. The so called evidence would have to be planted because there is no way they could have actioned this scenario twice. Little scraps of debris. No large wing or tail sections that could have possibly entered the Pentagon, or Wtc for that matter, without breaking off in large sections.

    It is almost pointless to post YouTube vids anymore bc the Internet is inundated with disinfo agents and Tin Foil haters looking for any reason to discredit. The scenarios I listed above are what the Tin Foil haters can’t answer, but as long as they have “identified” remains they still work the angle of Commercial Airplanes which not one single video unequivocally demonstrates.

    So in the end of the day, we are merely taking the 9/11 Commission at it’s word that Flight 11 and 175 were flown by amateurs with exact precision through the Manhattan skyline without fail and no deviation of target. Truly a miracle scenario. An elaborate hoax baffling the senses of all people.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s